data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c879/5c879af1cc93c1ea96d30d2aea7ad68716ca1ac1" alt=""
Needless to say, cutting off the series at that point would preclude the chance of seeing Dick mature and become Nightwing. (Although, that role has allegedly sparked the interest of another 'Hero.') But, given that the Smallville people are helming The Graysons, you can bet we'll get enough continuity in-jokes and fan service to keep people interested. Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing Gar Logan surface as a sideshow act in the Graysons' circus.
In talking about the new series with my friend Combustible Monkey this morning, though, we noted that it reflects yet another example of the disconnect between using super-properties on TV and the big screen. Remember, the 'Ville's big thing is, No Spandex. Same with Heroes. The no-spandex rule sticks out even further in the latter; is there any doubt that if Heroes were a comic, the first series would have ended with the ensemble banding together and going after the Company? Instead, the last 'proper' superhero show on network TV was Birds Of Prey. How sad is that?
Warner Brothers, which controls DC's properties, is particularly myopic when it comes to TV, especially when you consider the critical and commercial success of its' animated shows; Batman: TAS saved animation for me in the '90s and the Justice League programs displayed the kind of ensemble work Heroes still wishes it could pull off. As Monkey points out, WB would be best served easing up on its Batman/Superman obsession and developing one of its' lower-tier characters, like The Question, Dr. Fate, The Spectre, or ...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/baee5/baee59d1beaf81364edfc84d7d7c11b6b3f6dea4" alt=""
Ironically, I've come to learn that the reason we don't already have a Starman series is precisely because the BOP series flopped so badly. Which makes that even sadder. And that's probably why the WB feels it has to keep spinning on the Bat/Superaxis to make a character "viable."
No comments:
Post a Comment